Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Interesting article on hydraulic roller vs hydraulic cam.


2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2734
Date:
Interesting article on hydraulic roller vs hydraulic cam.
Permalink  
 


Some  interesting  rational for hyd roller vs hyd cam.  No break in.  The profile of the roller allowing to more/better fuel and air flow. Less wear.

 

http://www.badasscars.com/index.cfm/page/ptype=product/product_id=100/prd100.htm



__________________

Jim L

Lake City



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2444
Date:
Permalink  
 

And you don't need the oil additive.

__________________

Kevin

Northwestern Ohio



Super Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 654
Date:
Permalink  
 

One of these is going in to my 383 Stroker build.


__________________

Darren - Crystal, MN
1972 4-door Chevelle driver/racer
2003 Silverado 1500HD Crew Cab



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7323
Date:
Permalink  
 

If you're going to replace a flat tappet cam, it only makes sense to step up to the roller for all the reasons mentioned.
The price is still about double but far less than just a few years ago as they become more main stream.

__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2734
Date:
Permalink  
 

If going to a roller can and lifters, whats your thought on the rockers?  Are you going that route on you engine build?



__________________

Jim L

Lake City



Super Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 654
Date:
Permalink  
 

I already had a set of 1.6 Comp roller rockers so they are going in my new build.

__________________

Darren - Crystal, MN
1972 4-door Chevelle driver/racer
2003 Silverado 1500HD Crew Cab

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!