Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 1969 Gas tank question...


President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7323
Date:
1969 Gas tank question...
Permalink  
 


Yes, but you need to still be using the charcoal return canister under the hood for it to work that way. If the fuel return has been eliminated, you need a vented cap.

Do you have your car back ??

Aren't you supposed to be in Duluth ??



-- Edited by Lost in the 60s on Saturday 6th of October 2012 01:10:29 PM

__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1260
Date:
Permalink  
 

I believe on the '69 (non El Camino) cars that there is a fuel vent surge on top of the tank and you are supposed to use a non vented cap.  Am I correct?



__________________

 

'69 Convertible,  Lemans Blue, 454, 200 4R, 12 Bolt. 

Jon H.  Lino Lakes



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1260
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lost in the 60s wrote:

Yes, but you need to still be using the charcoal return canister under the hood for it to work that way. If the fuel return has been eliminated, you need a vented cap.

Do you have your car back ??

Aren't you supposed to be in Duluth ??



-- Edited by Lost in the 60s on Saturday 6th of October 2012 01:10:29 PM


I thought only the 70+ cars had the canister under the hood, I certainly don't, whether that was factory or eliminated later I don't know.  I do believe there is a return line off the fuel pump.?

Car is not back.  Engine is torn down, waiting for the next move.

Not in Duluth.  Lived there for four years, I don't know why anybody would want to vacation there. JMO.



__________________

 

'69 Convertible,  Lemans Blue, 454, 200 4R, 12 Bolt. 

Jon H.  Lino Lakes



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7323
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jon H wrote:
 

I thought only the 70+ cars had the canister under the hood, I certainly don't, whether that was factory or eliminated later I don't know.  I do believe there is a return line off the fuel pump.?

Car is not back.  Engine is torn down, waiting for the next move.

Not in Duluth.  Lived there for four years, I don't know why anybody would want to vacation there. JMO.


          laughing

           You're right, I was thinking wrong....the '69's didn't have the canister. I believe the 69's were vented cap. I know the 70's were.

          Did Wheeler find anything wrong with internal parts, or just oblong cylinders.



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2745
Date:
Permalink  
 

I was wondering about the results Wheeler found as well.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



Founding Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 2787
Date:
Permalink  
 

69s had a non-vented cap.

The vent looks like this:

XTV-689.jpg

The picture shows it upside-down, but the 2 lines connect w/ hoses to the steel vent lines coming out of the top of the tank on the right side toward the front. It is tucked up behind the rear axle with the other end pointing up.



__________________

Derek Kiefer - Mantorville, MN

69 Malibu Pro-Touring stroker LS1-383/T56 - 69 SS396-325/3spd project



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1260
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chris R wrote:

I was wondering about the results Wheeler found as well.


 Final results are not in yet.  I will post what I can when I can.  Still dealing with GM on this and have to use some caution.



__________________

 

'69 Convertible,  Lemans Blue, 454, 200 4R, 12 Bolt. 

Jon H.  Lino Lakes

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!