Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Looking for your opinion?


Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Looking for your opinion?
Permalink  
 


With my car getting so close to being finished, I have been looking at the photo below (background on my PC) a lot and just not sure if I like how the front wheels look in the picture?  Seems like to much room, too small of tire?  Without redoing the whole rims, etc.  any/all feed back would be appreciated.  I have a 225/60/15 on the front and a 255/60/15 on the back.



Attachments
__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 706
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think the rake of the car is what is throwing you off. The front typically is lower but here it looks higher than the rear.

You could play around with springs on front and rear to change the rake, perhaps drop the front so the gap is not as larger in the wheel well.

__________________

John E - Rogers, MN

Instructions? All I need is the exploded view.
70 El Camino soon to be ls1/t56
64 Malibu SS



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1262
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree with John, drop the front or lift the rear, preferably lift the rear.

__________________

 

'69 Convertible,  Lemans Blue, 454, 200 4R, 12 Bolt. 

Jon H.  Lino Lakes



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

Maybe I should go with wheels like this?



Attachments
__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

Wow, I assumed there was no engine in it for that pic.

Yeah, drop the front. Hotchkiss has 1, 1.5, and 2" drop springs available. I put 1.5" drop springs in the front of my Camaro because it was too high and I like the stance now with a slightly nose down rake. Didn't hurt the ride at all and actually firmed up the cornering...

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4764
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm with Mitch.  I like about an inch gap between the top of the front tire and the bottom of the fender.  I've used the Hotchkiss springs, and they work great.

I have a similar dilemma in that I figured out somebody used SBC springs with my BBC and added spacers to raise it.  Now I have to get new springs.  Arrrrrgh.

In the past I have bought stock springs and cut out a half or a full coil to lower it and stiffen up the springs.  Only because the springs are half the price of Hotchkiss this way.  I'm going to save up for the Hotchkiss springs and do it right this time.

If you want it to be 1980 again... you can leave the front springs as is and install air shocks for that 'jackrabbit' look but it will handle like a slug! 

It also looks like the rears might be weak since it does sit low?

 



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

1999 SS Camaro LS1-6 speed

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 



3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4764
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

Maybe I should go with wheels like this?


 Loren if you do that you will be permanently in the CAC because we will personally remove the rims and put your car up on blocks until you come to your senses! 

 



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

1999 SS Camaro LS1-6 speed

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

A new set of lower springs for the front and you should be good to go. I also use a comparible size tire that you have. But 235 on front and 245 on back.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Date:
Permalink  
 

Jumping to a 70 275 on the rear will bring the back up and front down and fill the rear wheel well out. It is a very tall and wide tire so you will give up on sharp corners with sidewall flex.

__________________


Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

No worry's on the air shocks,not putting those on. I think I will order the hotchkis springs and give those a try. Thanks for the feedback, I will be a lot happier with the look if I bring the front down a bit. The rear springs are new, not sure if I am going do anything with those right away? We will see how it looks after dropping the front.

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

Did you have the front control arms rebushed lately ?



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes, everything was rebuilt.

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

If the control arms were tightened with the weight off, that could be why the front is high. The arms need to have full weight on when the bolts are tightened.



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

I did install them without the motor installed? Should I loosen them and re-torque them?

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 706
Date:
Permalink  
 

yes


__________________

John E - Rogers, MN

Instructions? All I need is the exploded view.
70 El Camino soon to be ls1/t56
64 Malibu SS



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2439
Date:
Permalink  
 

I say wait till you put the top up and take another pix, it will look different. Then make adjustments if you think there needed.



__________________

Kevin

Northwestern Ohio



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

I did install them without the motor installed? Should I loosen them and re-torque them?


 Absolutely...loosen all 4 on each side and bounce the car a few times to settle it and see what that does for the stance.

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

If the springs are new. It takes some road mileage to get them to settle.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 460
Date:
Permalink  
 

What springs are in it now ?
You may be able to cut them to get get yoru desired ride hieght. I am saving front end for next year researching a lot and there is a ton of aftermarket stuff out there & many have pretty high front spring rates if that is what you are after. Many have been happy with the Eibeck kit also, BMR, etc. How are you planning to going to drive the car ? Mostly street ? are you going mostly stock original ride and parts ? The aftermarket springs are pretty firm in the front. For a more origianl and reasonable spring look into Moog springs they are pretty much OEM and make springs for many companys. They have spring rates and other specs listed and you can calculate the ride height you desire. A lot of people go with SBC springs in BBC cars or light rate to get better ride height and luanch, while others will put in shroten springs with high spring rates to handle better in turns.

Mitch, I got my new rear end in , rear upper & lower arms and shocks in. I tighten all down. Should I loosen and re tightend everything down after engine and tranny go in? The Strange rear looks very cool.

What Mitch said could very well be what is going on.

__________________

Jim  -- Pine Island, MN



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

Bowtieman427 wrote:

What springs are in it now ?
You may be able to cut them to get get yoru desired ride hieght. I am saving front end for next year researching a lot and there is a ton of aftermarket stuff out there & many have pretty high front spring rates if that is what you are after. Many have been happy with the Eibeck kit also, BMR, etc. How are you planning to going to drive the car ? Mostly street ? are you going mostly stock original ride and parts ? The aftermarket springs are pretty firm in the front. For a more origianl and reasonable spring look into Moog springs they are pretty much OEM and make springs for many companys. They have spring rates and other specs listed and you can calculate the ride height you desire. A lot of people go with SBC springs in BBC cars or light rate to get better ride height and luanch, while others will put in shroten springs with high spring rates to handle better in turns.

Mitch, I got my new rear end in , rear upper & lower arms and shocks in. I tighten all down. Should I loosen and re tightend everything down after engine and tranny go in? The Strange rear looks very cool.

What Mitch said could very well be what is going on.


 

Yes, those parts should always be tightened when the drivetrain is in the car.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

Bowtieman427 wrote:

What springs are in it now ?
You may be able to cut them to get get yoru desired ride hieght. I am saving front end for next year researching a lot and there is a ton of aftermarket stuff out there & many have pretty high front spring rates if that is what you are after. Many have been happy with the Eibeck kit also, BMR, etc. How are you planning to going to drive the car ? Mostly street ? are you going mostly stock original ride and parts ? The aftermarket springs are pretty firm in the front. For a more origianl and reasonable spring look into Moog springs they are pretty much OEM and make springs for many companys. They have spring rates and other specs listed and you can calculate the ride height you desire. A lot of people go with SBC springs in BBC cars or light rate to get better ride height and luanch, while others will put in shroten springs with high spring rates to handle better in turns.

Mitch, I got my new rear end in , rear upper & lower arms and shocks in. I tighten all down. Should I loosen and re tightend everything down after engine and tranny go in? The Strange rear looks very cool.

What Mitch said could very well be what is going on.


I'm betting you have all urethane bushings and they will move after tightening but it wouldn't hurt to just loosen the bolts again after full assembly and let it settle to ride height.

Rubber bushings are what need to be tightened with full weight.

 

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

I stayed with rubber bushings, so I sounds like I need to loosen, let settle and the re torque.

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 895
Date:
Permalink  
 

Have the Hotchkiss 500LB springs in the front of my car.. still had to cut 1/3 of a coil off with a cutoff wheel to get them where I liked it. They are coming out this week..

__________________
You can sleep in your car, But you cant drive your house


2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

Rubber has more give then if you had eurothane bushings. Its especially noticeable if you use eurothane bushings on the upper eyelets of the rearend housing where they need to pivot and have no flex or very little at all for example.

Plus they would sit in an unnatural position and be twisted the entire time once all the weight is on them and wouldnt last as long. Another reason why it makes no sense to have your car raised up off its wheels when its in storage.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

I stayed with rubber bushings, so I sounds like I need to loosen, let settle and the re torque.


 

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

In preperation for making the necessary adjustments to bring the front down.  When cutting springs is it best to go a full coil, or half coil or simply by free-length measurment?  My understanding is the ratio it 2:1, if I cut a half inch height out of the spring it will drop the front 1 inch?  Am I understanding this correctly? 



__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



Founding Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 2750
Date:
Permalink  
 

The 1:2 ratio is true, but it's from the compressed height of the spring, not its free standing height.

__________________

Derek Kiefer - Mantorville, MN

69 Malibu Pro-Touring stroker LS1-383/T56 - 69 SS396-325/3spd project



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

Once I adjust my springs to get the correct ride height, should I be looking for a different set of front shocks to go along with it?  What I have is just stock replacement shocks, (monroe?, I can't remember what I put in there).  I do have a set of Doetsch shocks I picked up from Scott P. when I purchased the Hotchkiss upper and lower control arms for the rear with sway bar.  Would those be a better choice?



__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



Founding Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 2750
Date:
Permalink  
 

If the springs are stock spring rate, the stock type shocks should be fine. The rate won't change much just from cutting coils... now if you change to a stiffer lowering spring, then you need to be concerned with a shock that's valved for stiffer rate springs. I don't know anything about Doetsch shocks, maybe Scott would know what rates they're valved for.

__________________

Derek Kiefer - Mantorville, MN

69 Malibu Pro-Touring stroker LS1-383/T56 - 69 SS396-325/3spd project



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

I believe they are adjustable? They can be 60/40, 80/20, or 90/10.  If I go that route what ratio should they be set to?



-- Edited by 69SSConv on Monday 11th of April 2011 03:41:04 PM

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

In preperation for making the necessary adjustments to bring the front down.  When cutting springs is it best to go a full coil, or half coil or simply by free-length measurment?  My understanding is the ratio it 2:1, if I cut a half inch height out of the spring it will drop the front 1 inch?  Am I understanding this correctly? 


I would strongly recommend you do the loosen and bounce first before you decide to cut the springs. It may be acceptable as is.

The springs sit in a "pocket" in both the upper and lower arms and cutting anything other than a full coil will leave it misaligned with the pocket. I know people cut just a half coil, but you need to make sure one end is clocked properly. The left front coil on my '66 wasn't properly clocked and under compression moved sideways enough to wear thru the shock casing and let the gas and oil leak out...

 

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

Brought the car home last night about 11 pm.  Quickly realized by headlights are not aligned correctly, was a little difficult once I got away from the street lights.  The interior and top are done!  Looks great.  Now onto the front springs, I loosened the lower control arm bolts and bounced the suspension a few times and didn't get much change?  Upon further investigation I noticed that I did not have the springs clocked correctly for the end of the spring to sit in the pocket correctly.  If I understand correctly, the end of the coil should be positioned between the two drain holes in the lower control arm.  Is that correct?  Looking at that it should immediately bring it down at least an inch or better.

 



-- Edited by 69SSConv on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 09:01:02 AM

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

Brought the car home last night about 11 pm.  Quickly realized by headlights are not aligned correctly, was a little difficult once I got away from the street lights.  The interior and top are done!  Looks great.  Now onto the front springs, I loosened the lower control arm bolts and bounced the suspension a few times and didn't get much change?  Upon further investigation I noticed that I did not have the springs clocked correctly for the end of the spring to sit in the pocket correctly.  If I understand correctly, the end of the coil should be positioned between the two drain holes in the lower control arm.  Is that correct?  Looking at that it should immediately bring it down at least an inch or better.

 



-- Edited by 69SSConv on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 09:01:02 AM


 Yup, you can see the low spot of the pocket for the end of the spring to sit in. You need to loosen the upper shaft bolts at the bushings too at the same time as the lowers.

Bummer about the spring. You're gonna have to remove the shock and drop the lower ball joint to relieve the pressure on the spring enough to rotate it.

Love to see pics of the interior. Maybe the sun will come out for a while on Thursday.

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

If your driveway is flat and level. Park the car in front about 15 feet from the garage door and adjust your headlights.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



Active Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thank you Chris, yes my driveway is flat/level.  Question is what should the proper adjustment be?  Is there a certain height the beams should be at X distance?  Not sure where to find the headlight alignment spec's, other than going by what looks right?  Chassis Service manual have this?  I have all the manuals for 69, just haven't look for this?

 



-- Edited by 69SSConv on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 02:09:50 PM

__________________

Loren B. - Princeton, MN

1969 Chevelle SS Convertible, Bright Torch Red, 396, 200-4R, 12 bolt 3.73 Posi

1969 Chevrolet C20, Orange/White, 350, 4-spd, 4.11

1980 Camaro, RS, Impulse Blue, 350, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi

1967 Chevelle Malibu 2-DR Hardtop.  In process



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7269
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

Thank you Chris, yes my driveway is flat/level.  Question is what should the proper adjustment be?  Is there a certain height the beams should be at X distance?  Not sure where to find the headlight alignment spec's, other than going by what looks right?  Chassis Service manual have this?  I have all the manuals for 69, just haven't look for this?

 -- Edited by 69SSConv on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 02:09:50 PM


The service manual will most likely tell you how to use the alignment tool you don't have....

I take mine out on a flat, lonely road and get the low beams to hit the blacktop about 75 ft out with the left one slightly turned to the right to avoid blinding oncoming drivers. The right side I try to get as straight inline with the car as possible. If you make cardboard cutouts ahead, you can tape them over the low beams to adjust the highs for straight and about 100 ft out.

 

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

Thank you Chris, yes my driveway is flat/level.  Question is what should the proper adjustment be?  Is there a certain height the beams should be at X distance?  Not sure where to find the headlight alignment spec's, other than going by what looks right?  Chassis Service manual have this?  I have all the manuals for 69, just haven't look for this?

 



-- Edited by 69SSConv on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 02:09:50 PM


 I just use a good judgement call. You can tell from the garage door "screen" when your too high because it will be obvious that the light is high enough to blind the other drivers. You want your low beams just low enough so that doesnt happen. Your highs can be higher then that so they shine down the road much farther.

You can also take your regular driven car and park it the same way and use those lights to give you an idea on where they should roughly be.



__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2790
Date:
Permalink  
 

I grabbed this off the 'net awhile ago...

Very specific procedure to avoid "squirrel chasers & a-hole lights" - headlight aiming



__________________

 

John D. - St. Louis Park, MN.

1965 El Camino - LT-1, 4L60e, 4wh discs, SC&C susp.
2013 F-150 Platinum - Twin Turbo 3.5

2018 Factory Five MkIV Roadster build thread



Super Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 680
Date:
Permalink  
 

Derek69SS wrote:

If the springs are stock spring rate, the stock type shocks should be fine. The rate won't change much just from cutting coils... now if you change to a stiffer lowering spring, then you need to be concerned with a shock that's valved for stiffer rate springs. I don't know anything about Doetsch shocks, maybe Scott would know what rates they're valved for.


 

 Scott wishes he knew what rates they were valved for.

 

They're Doetsch tech's 'Street & Strip' 3-way adjustables. Soft, medium, and firm. That's all I know! They are a good quality shock- I set them at 'medium' when they were installed and left them there. They have to be removed to change the adjustment.

 

There's some info on them here: http://www.shocksandsuspension.com/productinfo-item-40_dc-1.htm

 



__________________

Scott Parkhurst

Belle Plaine

 

Horsepower Junkie



3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4764
Date:
Permalink  
 

69SSConv wrote:

Brought the car home last night about 11 pm.  Quickly realized by headlights are not aligned correctly, was a little difficult once I got away from the street lights.  The interior and top are done!  Looks great.  Now onto the front springs, I loosened the lower control arm bolts and bounced the suspension a few times and didn't get much change?  Upon further investigation I noticed that I did not have the springs clocked correctly for the end of the spring to sit in the pocket correctly.  If I understand correctly, the end of the coil should be positioned between the two drain holes in the lower control arm.  Is that correct?  Looking at that it should immediately bring it down at least an inch or better.

 



-- Edited by 69SSConv on Tuesday 19th of April 2011 09:01:02 AM


 Loren, any updates on adjusting the control arms and the front height?  Pics required! 

 



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

1999 SS Camaro LS1-6 speed

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!