Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: ?'s regarding head volume and general overall condition/


2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2687
Date:
?'s regarding head volume and general overall condition/
Permalink  
 


Well I just tried the cc's method to check my head volume and something is wrong.  I use a 50 cc syringe from a friend that raises Angus cattle and thing don't add up. The head is a 65 702 head with an original volume of 98.427 cc's that have been missed most likelybeen milled  and had a valve job done, I think.  I got a volume of about 105cc's.  What do you guys use for measuring the cc's to get an accurate measurement?  Maybe there is a little increase when the valve job was done, or a little in the spark plugs; but this seems ways to much, thought it would be more around 95cc's.

I've included some photo's, so maybe someone can identify the valves and make overall comments on the heads and the block.

The pistons are Seal Power 2347P.  Would appreciate any information on these.  Specificaly the dome volumne and deck height.   I have done some research on these and think they are forged rather than cast.  Anyone know for sure?  Thanks.

-- Edited by jim larson on Friday 31st of December 2010 051504 PM

__________________

Jim L

Lake City



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1723
Date:
Permalink  
 

I typically use a syring like that to cc heads and it has always come out pretty accurate. But in looking at your picture I think someone cut the chambers to deshroud the valves. Have you measured the valves to see if they are bigger, I think they should be 2.08 intake and 1.72 exhaust.



__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2687
Date:
Permalink  
 

67ss wrote:

I typically use a syring like that to cc heads and it has always come out pretty accurate. But in looking at your picture I think someone cut the chambers to deshroud the valves. Have you measured the valves to see if they are bigger, I think they should be 2.08 intake and 1.72 exhaust.




 Original size valve should be 2.06 and 1.72.  Do I have to remove a valve to measure them?  I guess that would add some volume. But not as much as I was getting.  I'll will have to try another type syringe.  Would like to get something as accurate as possible.  thanks.



__________________

Jim L

Lake City



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Date:
Permalink  
 

If you do shave the heads a tick it will bump up compression run a thin head gasket as well.

__________________


1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1723
Date:
Permalink  
 

One other thing is you need to put something flat over the chamber to make sure you are getting an accurate reading. I have a clear piece of plexiglass with a couple holes drilled in it. One for filling and the other to let air escape.

__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2789
Date:
Permalink  
 

Beat me to it Chris...

A thin smear of vaseline or wheel bearing grease around the chamber, and press down firmly to get a good seal.

(This might affect your "actual/perfect" readings somewhat, but the error will be consistant from hole to hole... so who cares.)

__________________

 

John D. - St. Louis Park, MN.

1965 El Camino - LT-1, 4L60e, 4wh discs, SC&C susp.
2013 F-150 Platinum - Twin Turbo 3.5

2018 Factory Five MkIV Roadster build thread



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2687
Date:
Permalink  
 

Use the vaseline with the Plexiglas method; but just rubbing alcohol. Got approximately 101CC's using a 12 cc syringe. I am going to have to find a larger syringe to be more accurate. Can't believe those 100 cc's syringes from China sold at jegs and sumitt are to accurate.

Stan, Car did not run the best on pump gas, unless I added octane supreme 130 to boost the octanes to around 98, that kind of why I want to determine the static and dynamic compression ratio, to see if I can change things to make it run better.

__________________

Jim L

Lake City



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Date:
Permalink  
 

Change cams and that can solve the problem or reduce octane needed.
The engine I just pulled off the dyno was running 93 BP pump gas and did not have one bit of knock. That has a 10.5:1 compression ratio and the cam I found out after the session is used for the Edlebrock 410HP crate engine.

__________________


2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

Are you CC'ing these heads for plans to do some porting?

__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2687
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chris R wrote:

Are you CC'ing these heads for plans to do some porting?



Just want to determine the correct static and dynamic compression ratio, then can deceided if I want to change cam, gasket thickness or some porting?

 



__________________

Jim L

Lake City



Super Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 680
Date:
Permalink  
 

It sure looks like the valves are pretty deep into the seats.

Brand new valves and new seats allow the valve heads to extend into the chamber more, which will take up a few cc. If yours are 'flush' to the chamber surface like they appear, you'll have gained a few cc of chamber volume as a result.

It's not a bad thing, except for the reduced compression. Less shrouding and less edges in the chamber area are both good things for flow and detonation avoidance.

But if you're wondering how you could have possibly gained a few cc, I'd bet on the valves sinking a bit...

__________________

Scott Parkhurst

Belle Plaine

 

Horsepower Junkie



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2687
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks for the info Scott. I recheck the volume yesterday with a 60 cc syringe I got from my vet. All 4 cylinders were just about exactly 100 CC, if the syringe was accurate. Don't think the heads were shaved very much in the rebuild years ago. I Was told the engine was rebuilt in the early 80's and had less then 10,000 miles on the rebuild. The camshaft turned out to by an old cam dynamics and the pistons were seal power piston. Does that seem logical. I bought the car in 2004. Compression checked out at 175-180 lb last fall on a warm engine and no oil usage except for about 1/4qt per year that I attributed to leaks that I am trying to fix.

__________________

Jim L

Lake City

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!