Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Front disc swap advice needed


President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Front disc swap advice needed
Permalink  
 


I have a set up that I bought for my '67 GTO that includes a hold-off valve for the discs. I was under the impression that it fuctioned as a proportioning valve and was all I need for a swap. Inline Tube said I still need an adjustable prop valve in the rear brake line. Anyone know if that's true ?
This what I have... new disc/drum master, hold off valve in front line, both lines going to original distribution block.


__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1723
Date:
Permalink  
 

That is the exact same setup I have on my camaro and my brakes work mint without having any other proportioning valve. If you were running 4wd discs it would be a different story.

__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks, Chris. All these parts are exact replicas of the factory setup for the 4 piston calipers. I didn't think the master or hold off valve cared how many pistons they were controlling.....wink

__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Founding Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 2748
Date:
Permalink  
 

Which MC are you using, and which calipers? If there's a bore size difference between 4-piston and single-piston, you might run into problems by mixing parts. I don't have any experience with 4-piston stuff, so I don't know what the MC bore size and caliper piston surface area is, but caliper piston surface area and MC bore size need to be sized to work together.

If the piston surface area is smaller, it takes less volume, but more pressure to do the same amount of work... so, if you're taking a MC designed for a big surface area, and using a caliper with a small surface area, your pedal will be very firm and you'll have high line pressure in the front before the rear starts to really do much... Other way around, and then you have too much mechanical advantage, so the pedal stroke will be very long & soft, and the rear brakes likely will lock up first.

If you're not mixing 4-piston and single-piston parts, then I wouldn't worry about it. :)

__________________

Derek Kiefer - Mantorville, MN

69 Malibu Pro-Touring stroker LS1-383/T56 - 69 SS396-325/3spd project



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1723
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have single piston calipers on mine, I forgot to mention that before.

__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Permalink  
 

67ss wrote:
I have single piston calipers on mine, I forgot to mention that before.


Me too, they will be single piston calipers.
Not sure on the bore size but aren't the masters for single piston's on a 69-72  1 1/8th ? I'll see if I can get the specs on mine. It came from Inline Tube.

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



Founding Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 2748
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah, 1-1/8" sounds right...

__________________

Derek Kiefer - Mantorville, MN

69 Malibu Pro-Touring stroker LS1-383/T56 - 69 SS396-325/3spd project



Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 895
Date:
Permalink  
 

How heavy of braking are you going to be doing. Autocross? drag race? road race?
Its my understanding all the hold off valve does is allow the shoes to come in contact with the drum before the front brakes are applied. I seem to do fine with my stuff using a stock 72 proportioning valve.. I think this had the holdoff function built in.

__________________
You can sleep in your car, But you cant drive your house


President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Permalink  
 

Just talked to Inline and the bore is the same and they use this master for other applications using the single piston calipers...smile  The shape of the master changed in '70 but the internals are the same between the 2 styles.

Tony, yes bt '72 GM had eliminated the separate hold off valve and incorporated that function into the distribution/ prop valve.

No road course work for this car for a long time, if ever. It'll take years before the body is in complete paint, let alone a worthy chassis. I just want better brakes than 4 wheel manual drum. It could see a wee bit of "street performance" though.....wink

-- Edited by Lost in the 60s on Friday 7th of January 2011 12:30:05 PM

__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

You can just take your factory spindles and modify them to allow the caliper to bolt on with the proper caliper bracket and that would take care of the front discs. Looks like you already have a master and booster assembly. Your 75% there already.

__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chris R wrote:
You can just take your factory spindles and modify them to allow the caliper to bolt on with the proper caliper bracket and that would take care of the front discs. Looks like you already have a master and booster assembly. Your 75% there already.


That modification involves machining which I can't do and would cost money. I have a complete spindle set-up off a 68 Camaro ready to blast, paint and install. All I really need are 2 steel lines and new flex hoses to make the system complete....smile

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

It actually doesnt require any machining. Providing you have the stock 66 drum spindles. You just grind off a certain amount of meterial off a small machined nipple area of the spindle using something like a die grinder and your good to go. You dont need to do this since you already have the parts. But it can be done without having to buy another set of stock spindles and you only have to get disc brake caliper brackets.

Just an abservation. Not that there is anything mechanically wrong. But I noticed the 2 front brake lines cross each other and wont hurt anything. It just looks different is all.

__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chris R wrote:
 I noticed the 2 front brake lines cross each other and wont hurt anything. It just looks different is all.


Moving the distribution block to the top of the frame changed all the front line locations. I will most likely put a 90° fitting in the block for the left front brake and run that line outside the z bar bracket instead of under it. Then the 2 lines will run parallel. That was just a mock-up to see what I needed and what I liked and didn't. It will be cleaner once I decide on a final design. I'm kind of anal that way.

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

I have the exact same way you did it on mine and ran the left facing outlet to the left wheel and the right towards the line running along the frame over to the right wheel. The line coming from the master cyl enters the block from the front. It looks pretty good and tucks under Z bar nice and neat. 

__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7263
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chris R wrote:
I have the exact same way you did it on mine and ran the left facing outlet to the left wheel and the right towards the line running along the frame over to the right wheel. The line coming from the master cyl enters the block from the front. It looks pretty good and tucks under Z bar nice and neat. 


That is a neat way to plumb it. I would have to cut off the nut from the master to move it to the front as it is a different size or see if there is a  reducer adaptor available.

 



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS 350 rs



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2761
Date:
Permalink  
 

Napa has big cabinets with tons of drawers with tons of fittings and blocks like these and I just went through thier selection until I found one with the correct sized fittings I needed. Just so I wouldnt have to screw around with adapters on the lines.  

__________________

Chris - Ramsey, MN.

Dear Optimist, Pessimist, and Realist.

While you guys were busy arguing about the glass of water. I drank it!

Sincerly,

The opportunist.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!