My Viper isn't stupid fast. How would a Chevelle with a Viper engine weighing 500 lbs more than a Viper be stupid fast?
-- Edited by Back in Black on Thursday 29th of November 2012 10:37:45 PM
-- Edited by Back in Black on Thursday 29th of November 2012 10:38:37 PM
RICKS70SS said
Nov 29, 2012
There was a guy on team Chevelle that was putting in a V 10 out of a Viper. And into a 70 Chevelle. But I haven't seen anything for a long time on this project. Has anyone else heard or seen this ?
THANK Derek.. That guy is awesome at what he does. yeah I know he has a body man to help him out. But its just an awesone build. That thing should be a BEAST on the rd. id he can hold it down. It should be stupied fast
Back in Black said
Nov 30, 2012
RICKS70SS wrote:
Hey keith: Look again at that car. He's got twinn turbo's on it and its a V 10 ? if you can do 190 in a mile ! What do you think he's going to be able to do? HUH huh ? So I take it 190 mph isn't fast to you ? Most of us have never been in a car that went that fast. Guess your never late for work then . yeah Big guy I think he's going to be stupied fast . Or maybe crazy fast is that better. R T
First of all, you didn't mention twin turbos. Kind of an important piece to the puzzle. Even so, I stand by my statement that this vehicle will not be stupid fast. I'm not going to read all 19 pages but in the first page he alludes to a 700 hp limit. At that power level, it has the potential to be silly fast. But I predict it won't even reach the silly fast bracket. You're talking about a 4000 lb rear wheel drive brick. And he better baby that T56.
What do I think it will run in the standing mile with 700 hp?? 170 tops. It's not all about the power my friend.
FYI...this is stupid fast:
http://www.youtube.com/user/TTGallardo2006
-- Edited by Back in Black on Friday 30th of November 2012 11:48:45 AM
RICKS70SS said
Nov 30, 2012
Hey keith: Look again at that car. He's got twinn turbo's on it and its a V 10 ? if you can do 190 in a mile ! What do you think he's going to be able to do? HUH huh ? So I take it 190 mph isn't fast to you ? Most of us have never been in a car that went that fast. Guess your never late for work then . yeah Big guy I think he's going to be stupied fast . Or maybe crazy fast is that better. R T
Back in Black said
Nov 30, 2012
RICKS70SS wrote:
Back in Black wrote:
Derek69SS wrote:
Later in the thread he's talking about 1000hp with 2 turbos and intercoolers.
That is "stupid fast" to a guy who drives a FWD Monte Carlo.
(not that I should razz Rick, his car is faster than anything of mine that currently runs... )
I'm thinking you just don;t like the way I put it saying stupied fast.
You write it anyway you like. I have absolutely no problem with that.
The bar has been set quite high for "stupid fast" in my opinion. See the link to the video in my previous post. Unfortunately, I will never know what it's like to own a stupid fast car. Probably will never get a ride in one either.
Did that guy with the white 70, 71, or 72 with the twin turbo LS engine ever run the standing mile? Didn't it have around 1000 hp?
-- Edited by Back in Black on Friday 30th of November 2012 04:19:23 PM
Derek69SS said
Nov 30, 2012
Later in the thread he's talking about 1000hp with 2 turbos and intercoolers.
That is "stupid fast" to a guy who drives a FWD Monte Carlo.
(not that I should razz Rick, his car is faster than anything of mine that currently runs... )
Back in Black said
Nov 30, 2012
Derek69SS wrote:
Later in the thread he's talking about 1000hp with 2 turbos and intercoolers.
That is "stupid fast" to a guy who drives a FWD Monte Carlo.
(not that I should razz Rick, his car is faster than anything of mine that currently runs... )
It's all about one's perspective right? LOL
Well, I guess we'll find out if it's stupid fast IF and when he ever gets it to the track.
RICKS70SS said
Nov 30, 2012
Back in Black wrote:
Derek69SS wrote:
Later in the thread he's talking about 1000hp with 2 turbos and intercoolers.
That is "stupid fast" to a guy who drives a FWD Monte Carlo.
(not that I should razz Rick, his car is faster than anything of mine that currently runs... )
It's all about one's perspective right? LOL I'm thinking you just don;t like the way I put it saying stupied fast. And like Derek said.. I drive a 310 hp Monte Carlo. So that thing is crazy fast next to me
Well, I guess we'll find out if it's stupid fast IF and when he ever gets it to the track.
RICKS70SS said
Dec 1, 2012
NO Keith he hasn't finished the car yet its been an on going build. Not sure how many yrs he's into it. Derek might know the answer to that question.Keith if you click on the link that derek posted you can see the car. As far as I know I think it's just a rolling chassis.
Derek69SS said
Dec 2, 2012
The white twin turbo 71 was ever run anywhere that I know of, other than a chassis dyno...
Back in Black said
Dec 3, 2012
Derek69SS wrote:
The white twin turbo 71 was ever run anywhere that I know of, other than a chassis dyno...
My Viper isn't stupid fast. How would a Chevelle with a Viper engine weighing 500 lbs more than a Viper be stupid fast?
-- Edited by Back in Black on Thursday 29th of November 2012 10:37:45 PM
-- Edited by Back in Black on Thursday 29th of November 2012 10:38:37 PM
There was a guy on team Chevelle that was putting in a V 10 out of a Viper. And into a 70 Chevelle. But I haven't seen anything for a long time on this project. Has anyone else heard or seen this ?
It's a '67 Chevelle.
Looks like his last update was in July.
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3557464&highlight=viper+v10#post3557464
THANK Derek.. That guy is awesome at what he does. yeah I know he has a body man to help him out. But its just an awesone build. That thing should be a BEAST on the rd. id he can hold it down. It should be stupied fast
First of all, you didn't mention twin turbos. Kind of an important piece to the puzzle. Even so, I stand by my statement that this vehicle will not be stupid fast. I'm not going to read all 19 pages but in the first page he alludes to a 700 hp limit. At that power level, it has the potential to be silly fast. But I predict it won't even reach the silly fast bracket. You're talking about a 4000 lb rear wheel drive brick. And he better baby that T56.
What do I think it will run in the standing mile with 700 hp?? 170 tops. It's not all about the power my friend.
FYI...this is stupid fast:
http://www.youtube.com/user/TTGallardo2006
-- Edited by Back in Black on Friday 30th of November 2012 11:48:45 AM
Hey keith: Look again at that car. He's got twinn turbo's on it and its a V 10 ? if you can do 190 in a mile ! What do you think he's going to be able to do? HUH huh ?
So I take it 190 mph isn't fast to you ?
Most of us have never been in a car that went that fast. Guess your never late for work then . yeah Big guy I think he's going to be stupied fast 
. Or maybe crazy fast is that better. R T
You write it anyway you like. I have absolutely no problem with that.
The bar has been set quite high for "stupid fast" in my opinion. See the link to the video in my previous post. Unfortunately, I will never know what it's like to own a stupid fast car. Probably will never get a ride in one either.
Did that guy with the white 70, 71, or 72 with the twin turbo LS engine ever run the standing mile? Didn't it have around 1000 hp?
-- Edited by Back in Black on Friday 30th of November 2012 04:19:23 PM
Later in the thread he's talking about 1000hp with 2 turbos and intercoolers.
That is "stupid fast" to a guy who drives a FWD Monte Carlo.
(not that I should razz Rick, his car is faster than anything of mine that currently runs...
)
It's all about one's perspective right? LOL
Well, I guess we'll find out if it's stupid fast IF and when he ever gets it to the track.
NO Keith he hasn't finished the car yet its been an on going build. Not sure how many yrs he's into it. Derek might know the answer to that question.Keith if you click on the link that derek posted you can see the car. As far as I know I think it's just a rolling chassis.
The white twin turbo 71 was ever run anywhere that I know of, other than a chassis dyno...
Figures.